News
The Legal Pitfalls of Using AI to Land Your Dream Job
Job applicants are using AI to land new positions, with some even using AI tools to help them formulate “model” answers – in real time – during remote interviews. Despite an absence of law and regulation on the topic, there are meaningful steps employers can take to restrict the practice.

It is no secret that job applicants are using AI to boost their chances of landing a new position. Recent studies suggest that about 50% of job seekers use ChatGPT to generate resumes and/or cover letters. Less well known, however, is that candidates are also using AI to “ace” their remote interviews. While few would object to using an AI tool to generate potential practice interview questions based on the job description or information about the interviewer (in fact, a Google Super Bowl ad promoted this practice), the issue is far murkier when an applicant uses an AI tool to answer questions during a remote interview.
While federal and state legislatures and agencies have not formally addressed the use of AI by job applicants, existing federal employment guidance and laws on employers’ use of AI tools provide a window into how employers might restrict applicants’ AI use. For example, it is well established that an employer cannot use AI to discriminate against applicants. However, an employer should be free to adopt a general policy prohibiting AI based on a legitimate, nondiscriminatory business reason – such as blocking plagiarism and minimizing misrepresentations about skills and experience. Indeed, an applicant who uses an AI tool to provide “model” answers to interview questions – à la Cyrano de Bergerac – is arguably misrepresenting herself and her abilities to a prospective employer. This is particularly true for a software engineer who uses AI to help her write sample code during an interview. Surely employers have a right to know whether an applicant truly possesses the skills and expertise she claims or demonstrates during an interactive interview.
Some states – like Illinois – require employers to disclose their use of AI in the hiring process. This suggests that employers could require candidates do the same. It would seem prudent for the organization to inform applicants about the use of technology that can detect the influence of AI in resumes and during the interview process and that offenders will be disqualified.
Employers should consider taking the following steps to address job applicants’ use of AI:
- Ensure there are legitimate nondiscriminatory business reasons for prohibiting or restricting the use of AI during the application process.
- Post a notice about your AI policies on your application portal and include a link to those policies.
- Consider requiring candidates to attest that they have not used AI in any part of the application process or, alternatively, require them to disclose their use of AI.
- Train recruiters and interviewing staff to detect the use of AI and consider employing software tools to facilitate that detection process.
As always, consult with a qualified attorney before implementing any AI policy in your job application process.
Article provided by INPLP member: Jason Kravitz (Nixon Peabody, USA)
Discover more about the INPLP and the INPLP-Members
Dr. Tobias Höllwarth (Managing Director INPLP)
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- April 2025
- März 2025
- Februar 2025
- Jänner 2025
- Dezember 2024
- November 2024
- Oktober 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- Juli 2024
- Juni 2024
- Mai 2024
- April 2024
- März 2024
- Februar 2024
- Jänner 2024
- Dezember 2023
- November 2023
- Oktober 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- Juli 2023
- Juni 2023
- Mai 2023
- April 2023
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010