News
CaliforniAI: New Executive Order takes on Generative AI
California Governor, Gavin Newsom, issues Executive Order on Generative AI, which echoes some points in the recent Texas and Connecticut AI laws and goes further, imposing detailed, time limited obligations on California State agencies.
Key points:
General:
- The State of California endeavors to continue leading the world in the responsible development, adoption, and implementation of new technologies for the benefit of all Californians and the California economy
- GenAI can enhance human potential and creativity but must be deployed and regulated carefully to mitigate and guard against a new generation of risks.
- The unprecedented speed of innovation and deployment of GenAI technologies necessitates measured guardrails to protect against potential risks or malicious uses, including but not limited to, bioterrorism, cyberattacks, disinformation, deception, and discrimination or bias.
- The development of GenAI will necessitate united governance on issues of consumer data, financial services, healthcare, and innumerable other areas critical to our society, and Newsom's administration looks forward to engaging with the Legislature in furtherance of this aim.
Operative:
Ongoing:
Legal counsel for all State agencies, departments, and boards subject to the Governor's authority will consider and periodically evaluate for any potential impact of GenAI on regulatory issues under the respective agency, department, or board's authority and recommend necessary updates, where appropriate, as a result of this evolving technology.
Within 60 days of issuance of this Order:
- Certain California agencies will present a report to the Governor examining the most significant, potentially beneficial use cases for deployment of GenAI tools by the State; setting forth the potential risks from the use of GenAI.
All agencies shall submit to the California Department of Technology an inventory of all current high-risk uses of GenAI within the agency or department to the California Department of Technology. They need to appoint senior management to conduct this and to update it on a regular basis.
By Fall 2023:
Agencies are directed to work with the University of California, Berkeley, College of Computing, Data Science, and Society and Stanford University's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence to develop and host a joint California-specific summit in 2024, to engage in meaningful discussions and thought partnership about the impacts of GenAI on California and its workforce and how all stakeholders can support growth in a manner that safeguards Californians.
By January 2024:
Certain California agencies will issue (and later regularly update) general guidelines for public sector procurement, uses, and required trainings for use of GenAI, including for high-risk scenarios such as for consequential decisions affecting access to essential goods and services
By March 2024:
- Agencies will perform a joint risk analysis of potential threats to and vulnerabilities of California's critical energy infrastructure by the use of GenAI, including those which could lead to mass casualty events and environmental emergencies, and make recommendations for further administrative actions and/or collaboration with the Legislature to guard against these potential threats and vulnerabilities. These recommendations will subsequently be updated at a cadence determined by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services.
- The California Department of Technology will establish the infrastructure to conduct pilots of GenAI projects, including California Department of Technology approved environments, or "sandboxes," to test such projects.
By July 2024:
- Certain California agencies will develop guidelines for State agencies and departments to analyze the impact that adopting a GenAI tool may have on vulnerable communities, including criteria to evaluate equitable outcomes in deployment and implementation of high-risk use cases
- All state agencies under the Governor's authority shall consider pilot projects of GenAI applications, in consultation with the state workforce or organizations that represent state government employees, and experts as appropriate from civil society, academia, and industry.
- Trainings will be available for state government worker use of state-approved GenAI tools to achieve equitable outcomes, and to identity and mitigate potential output inaccuracies, fabricated text, hallucinations, and biases of GenAI, while enforcing public privacy and applicable state laws and policies.
By January 2025:
- The State's project approval, procurement, and contract terms, will be updated, incorporating analysis and feedback obtained
- Provide criteria to evaluate the impact of GenAI to the state government workforce, guidelines on how State agencies and departments can support state government employees to use these tools effectively and respond to these technological advancements.
#dataprivacy #dataprotection #AIgovernance #AIprivacy #privacyFOMO
Article provided by INPLP member: Odia Kagan (Fox Rothschild LLP, United States)
Discover more about the INPLP and the INPLP-Members
Dr. Tobias Höllwarth (Managing Director INPLP)
News Archiv
- Alle zeigen
- November 2024
- Oktober 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- Juli 2024
- Juni 2024
- Mai 2024
- April 2024
- März 2024
- Februar 2024
- Jänner 2024
- Dezember 2023
- November 2023
- Oktober 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- Juli 2023
- Juni 2023
- Mai 2023
- April 2023
- März 2023
- Februar 2023
- Jänner 2023
- Dezember 2022
- November 2022
- Oktober 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- Juli 2022
- Mai 2022
- April 2022
- März 2022
- Februar 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- Juli 2021
- Mai 2021
- April 2021
- Dezember 2020
- November 2020
- Oktober 2020
- Juni 2020
- März 2020
- Dezember 2019
- Oktober 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- Juli 2019
- Juni 2019
- Mai 2019
- April 2019
- März 2019
- Februar 2019
- Jänner 2019
- Dezember 2018
- November 2018
- Oktober 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- Juli 2018
- Juni 2018
- Mai 2018
- April 2018
- März 2018
- Februar 2018
- Dezember 2017
- November 2017
- Oktober 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- Juli 2017
- Juni 2017
- Mai 2017
- April 2017
- März 2017
- Februar 2017
- November 2016
- Oktober 2016
- September 2016
- Juli 2016
- Juni 2016
- Mai 2016
- April 2016
- März 2016
- Februar 2016
- Jänner 2016
- Dezember 2015
- November 2015
- Oktober 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- Juli 2015
- Juni 2015
- Mai 2015
- April 2015
- März 2015
- Februar 2015
- Jänner 2015
- Dezember 2014
- November 2014
- Oktober 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- Juli 2014
- Juni 2014
- Mai 2014
- April 2014
- März 2014
- Februar 2014
- Jänner 2014
- Dezember 2013
- November 2013
- Oktober 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- Juli 2013
- Juni 2013
- Mai 2013
- April 2013
- März 2013
- Februar 2013
- Jänner 2013
- Dezember 2012
- November 2012
- Oktober 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- Juli 2012
- Juni 2012
- Mai 2012
- April 2012
- März 2012
- Februar 2012
- Jänner 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Jänner 2011
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- Juli 2010